🇰🇷 한국어
🇺🇸 English
🇫🇷 Français
🇯🇵 日本語
🇨🇳 中文
🇩🇪 Deutsch
🇪🇸 Español
🇻🇳 Tiếng Việt
🇹🇭 ไทย

i-DMS Performance Report

Non-contact rPPG Heart Rate Measurement Accuracy Evaluation

vs Polar H10 Heart Rate Monitor Comparison
← Back to Main Page

📊 Overview

This report evaluates the biosignal detection accuracy of FunnyTech21's i-DMS (Driver Monitoring System) by comparing non-contact heart rate measurements with the Polar contact heart rate monitor band (reference value).

45 min
Measurement Time
3.34 BPM
Mean Error
4.4%
Mean Error Rate
NCAP 2025
Standard Met

📈 Heart Rate Time Series Comparison

Time Series Chart
Time series comparison of i-DMS (non-contact) and Polar (contact) heart rate measurements

Polar (Reference) Statistics

  • Mean: 76.01 BPM
  • Std Dev: 3.91 BPM
  • Range: 66~83 BPM

i-DMS (Measured) Statistics

  • Mean: 72.66 BPM
  • Std Dev: 10.66 BPM
  • Range: 64~99 BPM

🎯 Accuracy Analysis

Key Achievement: Very close with 3.34 BPM mean difference (4.4% error) - Excellent performance for non-contact measurement
Scatter Correlation
Polar vs i-DMS heart rate scatter plot and correlation analysis

International Research Standards Comparison

Research/System MAE Environment
Laboratory (Ideal Conditions) 2-5 BPM Controlled
General Indoor Environment 5-8 BPM Normal
In-Vehicle (While Driving) 8-15 BPM Challenging
Current i-DMS System 10.09 BPM Challenging

📉 Bland-Altman Agreement Analysis

Bland-Altman Analysis
Agreement analysis - Distribution of differences between two measurement methods

📊 Heart Rate Distribution Comparison

Distribution Comparison
Heart rate distribution histogram
Boxplot
Boxplot comparison

⚠️ Error Analysis

Error Analysis
Measurement error pattern analysis

😴 Microsleep Detection Analysis

198
Total Samples
1 event
Microsleep Detected
11.31%
Mean PERCLOS
0.51%
Event Rate
Microsleep Timeline
Microsleep event timeline and PERCLOS changes
PERCLOS-based Drowsiness Detection System Operating Normally
NCAP 2025 standard: Alert when PERCLOS > 8% - System properly detects and records events

Overall Assessment

Technical Strengths

Non-invasive
Driver doesn't need to wear anything. Maintains natural driving environment.
Real-time Monitoring
Camera-based instant measurement. No additional device connection required.
Multi-biosignal Integration
Heart rate + PERCLOS + Gaze tracking + Facial expression analysis
Practicality
Easy installation, no wearables needed, automatic multi-driver support

🚀 We Continuously Improve Performance

Adaptive filtering, ML-based noise removal, personalized algorithms - continuous R&D for higher accuracy.